11
submitted 1 month ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, the circle is my point. You can’t argue that it’s always bad for people’s health so you can’t study it. Being known bad for people’s health just makes it more important to find a way

[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Did you read the article? Do you even know what we are talking about?

The article specifically says how they managed to study drunk people without telling them to drink, and it's surprisingly easy: wait for people to get drunk on their own and then study the effects.

Kinda surprised that I have to spell that out for you.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Almost like I brought it around full circle , after posts questioning the ethics of studying it

[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

No, you didn't. You just didn't understand what everyone else was talking about.

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
11 points (100.0% liked)

science

22011 readers
1 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS