350
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 181 points 3 weeks ago

For anyone out of the loop (from the AP / quoted in the article) :

Why are people protesting in Nepal?

The demonstrations—called the protest of Gen Z—began after the government blocked platforms, including Facebook, X and YouTube, saying the companies had failed to register and submit to government oversight.

But they spiraled to reflect broader discontent about a lack of opportunities and corruption.

In particular, many young people are angry that the children of political leaders—so-called Nepo Kids—seem to enjoy luxury lifestyles and numerous advantages while most youth struggle to find work.

[-] Noerttipertti@sopuli.xyz 222 points 3 weeks ago

Cops firing live rounds at kids, killing almost 20 and injuring about 100 might have something to do with them snapping as well...

[-] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 125 points 3 weeks ago

Typical Newsweek, I've seen several people who have worked in Nepal say that corruption was spiraling out of control and people have been livid about it for months. The protests were already ramping up, which is why social media platforms were cut off, so videos about the corruption and investigations and means to plan protests were cut off. The "they didn't register in time" excuse is for the government to save face internationally.

[-] tyler@programming.dev 4 points 3 weeks ago

Several social media companies registered in time just fine and weren’t cut off so no, I think that’s just an excuse for the protestors.

[-] ms_lane@lemmy.world 50 points 3 weeks ago

'registered' just means 'Will censor information about government corruption for profit'

[-] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

no, it means "filled out a form with contact info".

[-] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago
[-] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

how dumb can you be? You think people that are protesting over social media bans are actually cognizant of the actual effects of social media? or what the law actually entailed? Look at the protests in the US over TikTok. People just want social media, they don't care the effects.

The truth of the matter is (before all the killings) is that all the 'social media companies' had to do was fill out a fucking form and they didn't do it. Then people pissed about missing their feeds went out and blamed it on the government, when it was completely the social media companies' faults. Sure, it sounds like the government was doing a lot of other shit, but acting like the government didn't give the companies time to register is just an absolute lie, there were several companies that managed just fine and they didn't get blocked. If the goal was blocking social media completely then they wouldn't have bothered with the registration, they just would have blocked.

People need to stop giving social media companies the benefit of the doubt. Now the situation is so out of control that people get to blame the government blocking social media as a reason to not do any sort of regulation against these tech companies in other countries. Now when a law in X country pops up saying "we need to regulate FB, TikTok, etc" you're going to get people referencing Nepal as a reason not to, even if FB/etc are literally causing genocides.

To be clear: this is NOT a commentary on whatever other bs the government is doing or the protesters are protesting. This is ONLY a comment on the OP i replied to stating

which is why social media platforms were cut off, so videos about the corruption and investigations and means to plan protests were cut off. The 'they didn’t register in time' excuse is for the government to save face internationally.

which is just a bald faced lie since they didn't cut off any social media that literally filled out a form.

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 15 points 3 weeks ago

Err, the law requiring social media to register also has very broad provisions for government mandated removal of content from these social media. So it's not exactly unlikely that that would have been the next step after the registration deadline had passed.

You are completely right that social media needs some form of regulation to avoid their nasty sides btw. But that's not what this law was seemingly intent on doing.

[-] mc900ftJesus@lemy.lol 12 points 3 weeks ago
this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
350 points (100.0% liked)

World News

50189 readers
2752 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS