275
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2025
275 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
83449 readers
2642 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
More like "How DMCA is ruining the internet" considering these companies are just complying with the law.
I think it says automated takedown requests, not automated reactions to those requests.
The reactions are legal compliance
Yes. So? How is that relevant, if we are talking about companies automating the requests with no regards for their accuracy ruining the internet? Isn't it a given?
Because the companies have no say in the matter. It doesn't matter if they're accurate or not, they have to comply with the law by taking them down.
Again, it's not the companies complying with the takedowns we are complaining about. It's the companies that automatically send takedowns, with no regard for whether the takedowns are legitimate. These companies are supposed to have a duty to verify their copyright claim is valid before sending a takedown. But no one is enforcing it, so they don't do it. That is the biggest issue here. We need to punish companies and individuals for sending illegitimate takedown requests.
I don't understand why you just keep repeating yourself
Again, no they don't. They are legally required to take it down by the DMCA until it's disproven.
How can the company SENDING the takedown request be legally required to take anything down?! They have nothing to take down. If they could take it down themselves, why would they need to send a DMCA takedown request?!
"These companies," in this case, being those sending the takedown requests.
Its about sending the takedown request in the first place, not the company complying with it. Its an entirely, automated process with no regard to validity
They're not exercising due diligence in confirming that the takedown requests are legitimate (for example, by actually asking the content owners).
Over again, yes, that's legal compliance. That's what the law demands.