218
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2025
218 points (100.0% liked)
Solarpunk technology
3423 readers
8 users here now
Technology for a Solar-Punk future.
Airships and hydroponic farms...
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
In Germany it's legal to back feed into your electrical system bypassing the need for a battery setup. In the US I don't know of anywhere that's legal.
Edit: I wasn't clear that I'm talking about just plugging a system into the wall. I'm not referring to the relatively common practice of a professionally installed net metering setup. The difference is that a these smaller setups plug right in and do not require an electrician or arranging net metering with your company because you'd never produce more than you can use even at peak production hours. It's a cost effective way to slow your meter down during peak production hours. Of course it's more cost effective when you don't buy the most expensive 400 watt system you can find.
It just got legalized in one state (Utah).
https://grist.org/energy/balcony-solar-took-off-in-germany-why-not-the-us/
Around here (Maryland) it is totally legal. You just need an interconnect that disconnects the panels from the grid when the grid goes down.
We actually have a system called net-metering, where the utility will buy electricity from residential customers at retail prices.
That's not what this. This is plugging straight into the wall with a small system. Against code pretty much everywhere. What you're talking about is only economically viable for large systems that will generate more than the owner can use at peak hours. These small systems are much cheaper, do not require an electrician, and won't generate enough power to require a net metering setup. The owner will use all of the power it generates even at peak hours. It essentially will just slow their power meter down as they draw less from the grid. These small systems are very common in Europe these days because their regulations have kept up better than ours. Also their outlets in general are safer.
Obviously where this person is that's legal, so there are exceptions. I assumed this setup involved a battery because they grossly overpaid for a 400 watt system.
If they're not generating enough to backfeed even at peak, and they can detect when the power cuts off and deactivate until it comes back, is there an actual safety/legal issue?
Mostly a code and legality issue. Local regulations just haven't caught up in most places. Also there's no rights for renters for this stuff just about everywhere in the US.
Okay, that makes more sense, thanks
Thats exactly whats being described here tho...
The price threw me, it's just unbelievable that it's that expensive for a battery-less 400 watt system. This moron got taken.
Yup, got ripped off hard. Are there import restrictions in the US that prevent people from buying dirrctly from china? Because most likely this 2000$ one is just a rebranded kit from China anyway.
Tariffs, of course. Trump is doing the fossil fuel industry's bidding trying to kill all renewables.
Solar panels got tariffed by Biden a couple month before trump took office.
I believe it was because they determined that Vietnam was dumping panels at below cost, which is deemed an unfair trade practice. I noticed this because I preemptively bought a couple panels before trump was inaugurated, and like a week after I did, the tariff was announced.
Sure but even with 100% tariffs it would still be cheaper to import.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5ygdv47vlzo
Lmao you are right
Do you just not know or did you actually look into it?
Spoiler, but you just don’t know. It’s legal in every state.
However, most states do have anti-incentive because it’s corrupt as fuck. Not all states, but where “net metering” exists, they don’t actually pay you for power you generate. You only get a credit to your bill. The amount varies state to state, and they don’t allow you to apply it to bullshit fees and infrastructure cost that are passed along…
I calculated it and it amounts to 22.9% of what they would charge you.
My system is well over designed, and I produce way more power than I actually consume at peak. I am interconnected, but I refuse to send power back because there is zero point. They would not reduce the bare minimum bill that I have, which is just baseline fees they charge me for having my house connected. I don’t have a bill otherwise because I’m self sufficient for the most part.
I would run an extension cords to my neighbor’s houses before I send money back to this regional Monopoly. Therefore, I just leave the main disconnect off between me and the grid.
For reference, I have a 36 kW system with 100 kWh battery set up. The amount of power that I produce is based on the amount of power that I use, including to charge batteries. I average 125 kWh Daily production and my higher production days are about 160 to 170.
Net metering is unfair to anyone who doesn't own a home. If you are connected to the grid, you are relying on it to provide energy when you aren't producing enough, so you should still pay your fair share of distribution/maintenance/etc.
If anything, they should pay you the wholesale generation rate at the time the energy is sent into the grid, not the year-round retail all-in cost.
In your case, it's great that you are storing enough energy for your own use, but there are plenty of people without any storage who rely completely on the grid at night, but then rely on their poorer, non-landowning neighbors to cover the cost of grid maintenance and energy production at more expensive times of day.
The point is to minimize the number or children who will die from the climate catastrophe.
Don't be selfish.
I'm talking about just plugging into an outlet. What you're talking about involves a hugely expensive electrician visit. With a small plug-in system you didn't need to involve the company because you're going to use everything you generate normally.