144

Copying this from Reddit (I still get the daily emails). Since I no longer post there, I figured I would ask here, and include my prediction: Will be more popular, possibly in stable release. Still won't be able to rotate photos natively.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 8uurg@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Also ImageTragick was a thing, there are definitely security implications to adding dependencies to implement a feature in this way (especially on a shared instance). The API at the very least needs to handle auth, so that your images and videos don't get rotated by others.

Then you have UX, you may want to show to the user that things have rotated (otherwise button will be deemed non-functional, even if it uses this one-liner behind the scenes), but probably don't want to transfer the entire video multiple times to show this (too slow, costs data).

Yeah, it is one thing to add a one liner, but another to make a well implemented feature.

[-] rarsamx@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

Once you implement Authentication/Authorization it's fairly simple to add a new function.

I think here, the problem is not the complexity of the task, but the developer's prioritization based on all the backlogged features.

Still, users can do this on their own. Directly on the folder, autorotating all pictures using wildcards.

[-] cron@feddit.org 1 points 10 hours ago

I would add file types to the list. JPEG is easy to rotate, but what about other image filetypes, images with embedded video, different video file formats etc.

[-] rarsamx@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

You can start with what you can. What can provide the most value and iteratively improve from there.

Sometimes as a developer or even product manager, you don't know what feature complete really means until people start using it.

Oh, by the way: https://imagemagick.org/script/formats.php

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
144 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

50894 readers
467 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS