939
How on earth? (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 36 points 5 days ago

It's bad for the cats too since the likelihood of getting sick, hurt or dying in an accident, fight, whatever is much higher. Some work from a gut feeling that letting them roam freely is better for them because it's more natural, but I don't think that's supported by the studies in the same way that the likelihood of them getting hurt from roaming freely is.

[-] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 28 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Agreed.

Also it being more natural is irrelevant. They aren’t wild animals. They’re pets. They’re much better fed than anything they’d compete with, so they aren’t having to worry about being sparing with their caloric expenditure. That’s also not natural.

Get a catio, don’t let your cat roam wild.

[-] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago

it’s more natural

it may very well be, but what most people don't realize is that the natural life of wild animals is not a disney fairy tale. their life expectancy is a lot shorter than that of the household pets and their death is often nothing to envy.

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2025
939 points (100.0% liked)

cats

24343 readers
1045 users here now

Typical internet cats. Videos, pics, memes, and discussion welcome!

Rule 1) Be kind

Rule 2) Follow the lemmy.world rules

other cat communities

midwest.social cats

cats with jobs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS