870
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
870 points (100.0% liked)
Programmer Humor
25874 readers
622 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Question 5 is incorrect,
name@example
is a fully valid email address, even after RFC 2822The spec of RFC 2822 defines an address (3.4.1) as:
domain
is defined (3.4.1) as:dot-atom
is defined (3.2.4) as:1*atext
meaning at least 1 alphanumeric character, followed by*("." 1*atext)
meaning at least 0"." 1*atext
If tomorrow, google decided to use its
google
top-level domain as an email domain, it would be perfectly valid, as could any other company owning top-level domainsGoogle even owns a
gmail
TLD so I wouldn't even be surprised if they decided to use itI don't know if they changes the answer to the question, but it now says
name@example
is valid.It does say it's valid, but also that it's obsolete, and while the RFC does define valid but obsolete specs, there is nothing defining domains without a dot as obsolete, and it is in fact defined in the regular spec, not the obsolete section
I see what you mean, I'm with you now.
It says valid but obsolete, which sounds like a contradiction to me.
Do email suffix not indicate a different domain like .org and .com for websites?
I didn't understand this one. How do you have a no dot domain? Like you need to distinguish from example.com or example.wtf
Edit: do you mean if you own
.google
you can have youremail@google
address?Yes, the top-level domain is still just a domain. I'm not aware of any public Internet services which are reachable from a TLD directly, and it's strongly discouraged by ICANN, but there isn't any technical limitation preventing e.g. someone at Verisign from setting up
example@com
.In response to your edit.
Yes, or countries could use their cctld, e.g. email@us or noreply@uk.
Or any tld owner could do the same with theirs, of course.
Pretty cool
you could also send mails within your local network, the hostname just has to resolve and have a mail service running