62
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You are aware that not every site confirms to your use case, right?

I'm not even arguing in support of ads; I use ad blockers everywhere I can. I'm just saying that sites that use ads to support their costs aren't free like the top level comment said.

[-] Sunlightl@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago

I'm aware of many things, in this case I just don't care. They can stop hosting or stop me from viewing their site.
If asked to go, I'll go immediately. It is common for sites to ask me to disable ad blocking, I won't so I leave.
If it isn't free then block me from viewing. I'll stay on the free internet just fine.
I never agreed sharing costs and will never do so in the case of ads.
They decided to host, I wasn't contacted to help share the cost of hosting nor ever agreed to ads.
They can leave the internet for all I care, it's full anyway.

Have you ever asked why don't they just put these sites behind a password, user sign in or other blocking methods?
The capability exists in most web servers. Why won't they do it?

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
62 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

764 readers
233 users here now

Tech related news and discussion. Link to anything, it doesn't need to be a news article.

Let's keep the politics and business side of things to a minimum.

Rules

No memes

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS