392
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] corroded@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

I think age of code plays a big part. 2 years ago: Yeah, I could do better, but it's workable. 15 years ago: Delete everything and just start from scratch.

[-] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

IDK, I just popped open a project from 10 years ago and it's perfectly clean, it's actually better than some of my modern code because it's not LLM-ified to save time.

I think it has a lot more to do with whether it was made in that "kind of crappy IDK what I'm doing" phase of programming. Some of your old stuff is going to be in that category sure. As long as you're out of that, however long it took you to get there or however far away it was in time, your code should be good.

[-] black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago

it's actually better than some of my modern code because it's not LLM-ified to save time.

Hmm that seems like an indication you're rushing things and maybe ought not do that?? 🤦

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
392 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

25681 readers
1404 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS