23
Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment (andymasley.substack.com)
submitted 11 months ago by AnonomousWolf@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Please actually read the article before downvoting me into oblivion, or debunk it before just shouting AI = BAD I'm also against AI for privacy reasons, but can we please stop pretending that it's destroying the environment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Saying it's not bad is too strong. All human activity has undesirable side effects.

But yes. People who peddle that environment narrative are definitely not interested in improving matters.

[-] AnonomousWolf@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Fair, it's not bad in comparison with things like Beef or Streaming 4k

But it's still bad

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
23 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

86489 readers
2546 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws