264
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

But nobody wants to look like a sad, malnourished bonerack

That is more common than you are probably aware of. Of course they don't see it that way, they only see themselves as too big, even when they are far from it.
Unfortunately many clothes designers prefer models that are basically clothes racks. This is AFAIK the reason the standards have become so unhealthy they need to be regulated.
There are plenty horror stories about fashion houses that pressure their models to lose weight, and even provide drugs to endure not eating, despite they are already underweight. So there is 100% a widespread unhealthy attitude towards weight in the fashion industry, that needs to be regulated. The same is not the case for being fat that I have ever heard about.

we should not be normalizing obesity

Absolutely, but there also needs to be the possibility for clothes brands that specialize in clothing for "big" people to show their products in a reasonable way.
It can be very difficult for both overweight and even just tall women to find clothes that fit well. I don't think banning advertising that helps anybody.
It's very obviously not either a fashion or beauty ideal.
This is not normally nearly as much a problem for thin people. Although it can be for very small women too, I've heard of some that have to buy clothes and shoes for Children.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago

So there is 100% an unhealthy attitude towards weight in the fashion industry, that needs to be regulated.

In fairness, the fashion industry is a circus, almost literally. The stuff you see on the runway is so ridiculous that they might as well simply be costumes and not clothes. And the models, while they do suffer real consequences, are forced to have an unhealthy look to fit the character they play in this circus.

I would much rather see positive education into how to actually be fit and healthy, so that teens have no reason to look at these circus performers as a template.

but there also needs to be the possibility for clothes brands that specialize in clothing for “big” people to show their products in a reasonable way.

Absolutely. The reality is, people come in all different shapes and sizes, so there's a realistic expectation that they'll still need to buy clothes. But the normalization of super heavy (or super skinny) needs to go away.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

The fashion industry is so much more than just the "circus" you mention. That is just the top of the iceberg. These standards have also spread to more common fashion, advertising clothes for ordinary people.

I would much rather see positive education into how to actually be fit and healthy, so that teens have no reason to look at these circus performers as a template.

If there's a method for that, that actually works, that would be great.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago

These standards have also spread to more common fashion, advertising clothes for ordinary people.

No doubt.

If there’s a method for that, that actually works, that would be great.

First, block and avoid ads. They are poison to the mind. Dropping social media is also strongly suggested.

It's hard to not fall prey to marketing companies if ads surround you on a daily basis, and I can't honestly imagine how difficult it must be for any teen who uses the internet or apps unfiltered. It's a losing battle if those influences aren't dealt with first.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I have all ads blocked, I never see ads in my everyday life, not on TV, not on my phone or on my computer, and not on radio. I'm personally 99.9% ad free.
But the only reason that's possible, is because we are a tiny minority, probably about 90% of people don't care enough or don't know how to get around the advertising.

To do that for everybody would be a major shift for society, that is not possible to do without a strong legal framework to achieve it, something that is not at all realistic in the current political situation in any place in the world.

So I think for now, the best we can do, is to regulate very thin models in the situation we are debating here.

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
264 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48976 readers
1998 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS