139
A new worst coder has entered the chat: vibe coding without code knowledge
(stackoverflow.blog)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
139 points (100.0% liked)
Programming
22492 readers
143 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I learned to code without a CS degree. I used a for Dummies book, W3schools, Stack Overflow and the good guidance of a senior developer. Learning to code was never the issue. And I think poking around in the code, experimenting, stumbling on unrelated but helpful answers, before finding your problem, are all great ways to become experienced that are prevented by the use of a tool like Bolt. If Bolt produces code that confuses experienced developers, how is the vibe coder supposed to learn anything useful from it?
I learned to program by shitting out God awful shell scripts that got gently thrashed by senior devs. The only way I've ever learned anything is by having a real-world problem that I can solve. You absolutely do NOT need a CS degree to learn software dev or even some of compsci itself, and I agree that tools like Bolt are going to make shit harder. It's one thing to copy stack overflow code because you have people arguing about it in the comments. You get to hear the pros and cons and it can eventually make sense. It's something entirely different when an LLM shits out code that it can't even accurately describe later.
Or that it can produce repeatedly. That's something that bothers me. Slight changes in the prompt and you get a wildly different result. Or, worse, you get the same bad output every time you prompt it.
And then there are the security flaws
Same thing here except I'm still not a developer. Just from time to time can do something if it's less boring than going another way.
I've even played through the "Turing Complete" game once, because I can't force myself to repeat it. And it was very interesting, absolutely cool, except that gun has fired. It appears the game changed enough though, maybe it's a sufficiently different gun to fire again. It's a game for entertainment, not even talking about real life.
And when there's a direct incentive, nothing is hard, for real. The hardship is in eyes tiring, time passing, time to render (in case of POV-Ray), migraines. But the task itself just takes it all as a payment, not as an effort.
And I sincerely don't get why my diagnoses are ASD and BAD despite describing this many times, that is, that happens with ASD too, but honestly ADHD seems the most intuitive abbreviation here.
Indeed. A huge proportion of Gen X professionals were self taught children who learnt on home computers and then grew up.
CS degrees don't teach you how to code. They teach you computer science.
just python and looking up every single thing i want the code to do "python print text"
"python get input"
"python loops"
"python iterate through list"
and this is why i'm such a diehard python shill, it doesn't require you to write 5 billion lines of boilerplate code to print some fucking text, it's very approachable.
To be fair, in the quoted passage the author is explicitly not referring to Bolt, but asking for explanations of specific, probably small scope issues from non-agentic AI tools.
Personally even while in school for CS I spent a large number of hours staring at a screen being totally unsure how to proceed to figure out what I didn't understand, most of it trivial details, or making random edits and hoping it would fix something. I'm sure there are advantages to learning by stumbling around, but I really don't think it's the ideal way unless you're already a very methodically curious person.
The temptation to jump directly to asking the AI to just do everything for you without yourself understanding it is definitely going to be a stumbling block for people learning, and I'm not sure if there's a good way around that one, but otoh something available 24/7 that can mostly accurately answer beginner questions in context and as you have worded them seems like it would be crazy helpful, so many times I just wasn't able to progress until I could get some attention from someone.