873
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And most startlingly: no git

Edit: y'all're right, version control is for wimps. What's life without some adrenaline?

[-] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Who needs git when you have a B: drive and a Save As command for tycoon43.asm

Version control? You mean this?

[-] potoo22@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
./src
./src_1998_11_05_added_people_swimming
./src_1998_11_06_added_death_mechanics
./src_1998_11_06_0_removed_swimming_lol
[-] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 10 points 1 day ago

Did the developer use any version control though? SCCS has been around since the early 70s, RCS and CVS since the 80s. The tools definitely existed.

Also, it was a single dev, which makes SCM significantly simpler!

[-] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

In my experience (some games in z80 and 68000 in the early 90s), version control wasn't considered until mid-90s sometime, and at first wasn't trusted. There were network backups, but I don't know if they had revisions.

Merging seemed like it couldn't possibly work well, so we would try to have separate ownership of different files. Although there would be only a handful of programmers on a team, so that was easy.

Prior to that, backup and versioning was manually handing a floppy or two to someone each week.

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
873 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

25540 readers
1154 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS