483
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
483 points (100.0% liked)
Bluesky
1506 readers
241 users here now
People skeeting stuff.
Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
Playing devil's advocate here: most websites are generated by programs, so it's possible it could be a coding error. That said, for it to plausibly be a coding error in whatever generator they're using, they'd have to store the Constitution with each paragraph in a separate file. That's the only way I could possibly see a "coding error" exclude the stuff that was excluded.
Edit: That is to say, obviously it is not a coding error. The text of the Constitution would be stored in one file because 1. that makes sense, and 2. storing per paragraph would add to overhead. And stuff in the middle of files doesn't just get deleted by a coding error.
Giving people the benefit of the doubt is how we are in this situation to begin with, screw your fucking head on right
There have been no changes to the Constitution that would have required them messing around with it at all. It's a static document except when there are amendments, and the most recent amendment was in 1992.
It's clearly bullshit. I can imagine the page disappearing entirely due to a coding issue, but the deletions were precise and clearly intentional. To what end, I can only imagine.
Do you know of anything else missing? If it was a "code" error, like in a Drupal site or something it would likely delete other stuff. Most U.S. government websites are modernized during the Obama administration or newer. This stuff doesn't happen due to code.
The text/tweet/whatever really feels just like made up words to convince non technically literate people it was a mistake.
It did delete more than the lines that most of the news articles mention. When I looked at the diff, the missing text seemed so arbitrary and wide in scope that a technical error was completely plausible. It made the news articles seem totally sensationalized.
Oh yeah I saw. Really feels like someone just looked at a paragraph and selected until the editor wouldn't let them anymore.