716
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
716 points (100.0% liked)
Open Source
39522 readers
515 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Not sure why you're being this hostile.
But that's the point, that you need workarounds for such a simple and (if you work with printed materials) essential feature.
That's literally not what I said, just that I don't think it's necessarily the best based on what I've read. I agree that it being FLOSS raises its appeal quite a bit, but it's not quite there yet to replace Illustrator for me.
Yeah, Adobe's predatory pricing is why I'm not paying for it. But sadly it's still the only tool I found that has all the features I need.
A CMYK file lol. But I'm not going to do work for you, you're clearly not engaging in good faith.
Because "best" is obvious a subjective statement, and you wanted to argue that...
Inkscape can make a CMYK-file, with an addon. It's pretty easy. Besides CMYK is only relevant is you want to print, and most graphics work today is for screens. It literally takes about 7 seconds to make it CMYK.
What feature do you need, that Inkscape can't do? Is it really the 7 seconds to make it CMYK, that breaks you?