684

What would you pick? (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)

submitted 5 days ago by LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone to c/books@lemmy.world

144 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Inucune@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Was on my way to post this. Revisited in ethics 101 in college, and again in ethics in technology(uni). 'Harm reduction' is the answer you are looking for, because no matter how perfect you think your ethic framework is, nature and bad actors will never respect it or take responsibility. Reality mocks philosophy's 'utopias.'

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I like the other interpretation, where the writer inserts the suffering so you the reader would find it more believable because you've been conditioned to accept that we can't have a good society without making at least some people suffer for it.