457
Electric Cars (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by DwZ@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maestro@fedia.io 29 points 4 days ago

Electric cars also reduce particulate dust. Because of regenerative braking they need to brake less often and less agressive. There was a study published just kadt week.

[-] rainwall@piefed.social 21 points 4 days ago

Also noise pollution. Under 35 mph, most car noise is engine noise.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 19 hours ago

eeeh, i don't think this is a particularly noticable benefit.
The amount of noise given off by cars at those speeds is just an annoyance, the real problem is the tyre noise at high speeds and that's only made worse by electric cars.
They recently lowered the speed on a through-road near me from 70km/h to 60km/h and it made a pretty huge difference in how tolerable it is to be anywhere near the road, the difference between a combustion and an electric car driving on a residential street is so much smaller that it's not even funny.

[-] brianary@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 days ago

So much this. Car noise is a huge problem.

[-] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago

But they increase particulate tire dust due to being heavier.

[-] Maestro@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago

Yes, but it seems from the study that the increase in tire dust is smaller than the refuction in brake dust

[-] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago

Brakes are iron and copper, the latter is an environmental contaminant. But tires pollute zinc and a hundred other petrochemicals. One is causing big problems with fish - 6PPD, but there are likely others causing yet unseen damage. Between the two brake dust seems more manageable in stormwater.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 3 points 4 days ago

Ooh cool, would love to see that paper.

[-] Maestro@fedia.io 8 points 4 days ago
[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 4 points 4 days ago

Yay! Thank you! Adding it to the archive. I keep my car in the level 3 regeneration, so mostly "coast" up to the stop. I'm glad to see such significant reduction. Also because I breath a lot of that dust when I'm cycling, less particulates = better.

Edit: Some key findings from the paper:

Key finding #3.8: As the level of electrification of a vehicle rises, the dependence on regenerative braking also increases, thus lowering PM emissions from brake wear. Based on recent evidence [30], regenerative braking can reduce, in the worst- case scenario (i.e. highest usage of mechanical brakes or equivalently lowest usage of regenerative braking), brake wear emissions by 10-48% for hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), 66% for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), and 83% for battery electric vehicles (BEVs)

Key finding #3.13: Vehicle weight is directly proportional to tyre wear emissions. For example, a car with a 20% higher mass demonstrated a 20% increase in tyre wear [13]. Electric cars are around 20% heavier than the equivalent conventional cars, so they emit around 20% more tyre wear [40], [42], [43].

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Im curious if the additional weight of EVs causes more tire wear and ends up negating any savings from the brake dust. We also have to consider manufacturing and disposal of both vehicles to be truly fair.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That and the increased road wear which grows exponentially (with the fourth power of axle weight) with the weight of the vehicle. That means a 2 ton car does 16 times more road damage than a 1 ton car. And before someone takes this to mean I prefer to not have EVs on the road, NO, I mean that this is a fact and we have to deal with it somehow while eliminating ICE. For example by making lower range EVs more attractive, since they already are acceptable in practice for a large proportion of road users. Going from ICE cars to ICE trucks, a common trend, is even worse in this regard since it adds significant emissions on top.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago

The additional weight, yes, as posted by @avidamoeba. Tho' those are different things, apples to oranges - brake dust and tire dust are not the same. With the power that some EVs have it's really easy to accelerate rapidly leading to faster tire wear. That is a choice made by the driver. I put my EV in eco mode, and gently accelerate. And try to ride my bike as much as possible, instead of my car. On the bike, I often try to accelerate as fast as possible, for cardiovascular and other health reasons, including just plain having fun!

this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
457 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

12831 readers
1259 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS