196
submitted 2 years ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.de
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

That’s a hell of a lot of money for a single telescope.

[-] setInner234@feddit.de 5 points 2 years ago

Let me tell you about the marvel at L2 called JWST

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago

Searching for dork energy in mere 6 years is worth it :D

[-] quatschkopf34@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago

I could show them some dorks a lot sooner for a lot less money.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago

Such massive amounts of dorkery capable of bending any bright thought!!

[-] tal@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That’s a hell of a lot of money for a single telescope.

I mean, right here you can see telescopes being sold for $49.99 on Amazon. It makes one question the entire budgetary process behind this Euclid scope.

EDIT: Not to mention that the Amazon one comes with a tripod, and as best I can tell from this article and Wikipedia, the Euclid scope doesn't have anything of the sort. If we could get Josef Aschbacher here right now, I think that the no-tripod issue would definitely be an incisive question to raise with him.

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
196 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

8332 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS