147
What is piefed? (feddit.uk)

Is just the same as lemmy? What makes it different? Is it similar to kbin? Why is it meant to be better according so some people?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sailorzoop@lemmy.librebun.com 72 points 1 week ago

https://join.piefed.social/features/

Differences between Lemmy and PieFed

  • Comments with -10 score are collapsed by default.
  • Communities are organized into topics. See https://piefed.social/topics.
  • Image-heavy communities can have a tiled/masonry view, like https://piefed.social/c/pics@lemmy.world
  • People who get downvoted a lot end up with a ‘low reputation’ indicator next to their name. You’ll know it when you see it.
  • Hide all posts based on keyword filters.
  • Keyboard shortcuts.
  • Upvotes in meme communities do not add to reputation.
  • Better UI design (somewhat subjective!)
  • Improved hotness ranking algorithm (subjective)
  • Voting is private.
  • See also features for healthy communities.
  • Each community has it’s own wiki. Demo
[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago
  • Upvotes in meme communities do not add to reputation.

Is this self-designated?

[-] sailorzoop@lemmy.librebun.com 16 points 1 week ago

I have no idea! I'm already hosting Lemmy so I don't really see the point personally.
Just thought I'd look it up for OP.

[-] rimu@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago

No, admins designate it.

Most instances do not use this feature, afaik. piefed.social does but most of the others do not.

[-] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In the code there is a function that recognizes if the name of the community contains "meme" and if so does not add the upvote to the vote counter of the user

[-] rimu@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

I wrote that code. It can be turned off or on by the instance admin. When an instance is created It's off by default.

Originally, when I wrote the feature comparison page, it could not be turned off.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I seriously doubt it because I'm pretty sure the point is to remove the ability for bot accounts and spammers/etc from farming up some karma to appear more legit for their nefarious/spamming purposes.

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think either way could possibly be exploited.

And putting all that aside, I think all image-centric subs should probably be included. It’s just as easy to farm karma with cute cats and flowers as it is with memes.

[-] tpyo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Excluding OC communities, right? Like you're not discounting people who put a lot of time and effort into their photography? Or even if they're not great photographers sharing pictures of their plants and gardens and hobbies, and pets, should have the same allowances as text only posts

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

This is a great comment; my initial reaction was “No because it would be easy to claim others OC was your own” but then the same could be said about text or link contributions.

Then I thought “well maybe reputation should only be based on comments” but that could be unfair to those who primarily post vs comment.

So now I don’t know what my position is. The best method is probably a blend of multiple strategies that can only be determined by engaging with the enemy.

tl;dr: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] tpyo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I appreciate this!

Generally oc forward subs are very stringent about it truly being OC and if caught posting something that isn't theirs will face consequences

Blurry pics of a cat's right up on the lens is low effort. Any pictures you see posted in a place like https://lemmy.world/c/astrophotography will not be low effort because those are removed. They also require the submissions to be OC

[-] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Comments with -10 score are collapsed by default. Voting is private.

I don't particularly care for these two items. I used to think user-curation was a good thing, but comparing Lemmy to Reddit, I have to say I no longer feel that way. Voting matters less on Lemmy and I think it's better for it, all things considered.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

Hide all posts based on keyword filters.

I'm very interested in this. I'm kinda stunned that lemmy doesn't do this natively.

[-] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

The Voyager client can do that. I use it a lot!

[-] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

I use connect which also does that. IMO, it should be native.

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

I can tell you it's life changing

[-] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

People who get downvoted a lot end up with a ‘low reputation’ indicator next to their name. You’ll know it when you see it.

Upvotes in meme communities do not add to reputation.

I think any kind of reputation score should be community specific. There are users whose commenting style fits one community but not another, and their overall reputation should be understood in the context of which communities actually like them rather than some kind of global average.

[-] dil@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Id say I say some controversial things yet I still somehow on average go positive karma wise, you have to be straight up hateful and ignorant on purpose to go negative imo

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

How exactly does the private vote thing work? I thought votes being federated was inherent to the way the fediverse is designed.

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

I believe piefed creates fake accounts to do the voting so it doesn't federate the actual account that cast the vote.

[-] rimu@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

That's how it used to work but I got rid of it because there were too many unintended side-effects. Now a private vote is just one that is not federated.

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

What were the side-effects? I was thinking of implementing something that doesn't directly federate votes, so it would be good to know what problems I'd need to solve before that can be done.

[-] rimu@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Some admins really love watching who votes for what and banning people based on that.

You can disagree with that if you like but if it means they get pissed enough to defederate your whole instance, you lose.

If your instance is just you and a handful of others, no one will notice or care. But once you have 1000 users the amount of anonymous votes will be noticed and there will be consequences. Maybe not defederation but everyone banned for upvoting bigoted content or vote manipulation will migrate to your instance and you'll be hosting the biggest shitbirds around.

I don't see a solution to this. As long as admins snoop on people's votes that will be the dynamic and PieFed puts itself at a disadvantage by doing anything different.

[-] rimu@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

Private votes are just normal votes except without the federation. So their effect is only felt on the local instance.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I'm not able to see any content behind those links or even the root site of https://piefed.social/ without what looks like creating an account and logging in. Is account creation and login required to interact with piefed at all? No anonymous reading?

[-] rimu@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago

This is a temporary measure to reduce load on the server from AI scrapers.

[-] sailorzoop@lemmy.librebun.com 6 points 1 week ago
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Gotcha. That's a non-starter for me then. I hope I'm not the intended audience for piefed. I never visit Facebook pages for the same reason.

[-] sailorzoop@lemmy.librebun.com 6 points 1 week ago

I could be entirely wrong, but that's what it looks like, yeah.
Absolutely hate registration walls as well.

[-] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"I just want to see what's there"

"Make an account first."

"Is it worth making an account?"

"Make an account and find out" "Oh you must provide a valid email to verify" "Surprise fucker its spam forever"

[-] cabbage@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You could check out another instance, for example https://feddit.online/ , which is visible without signing in.

Piefed.social used to be open for all, but I suspect it needed to be restricted due to AI scrapers. Not sure exactly what the reasoning is though.

You can find a list of instances here: https://fedidb.com/software/piefed

[-] lung@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Seems to be 100% Lemmy content

[-] cabbage@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago

There's no real difference, content flows freely between the two platforms.

I'm writing this in piefed - does it make my comment "piefed content", while your comment is "Lemmy content"?

The distinction makes no sense. And that's the point - use whatever platform you prefer, enjoy the same content anywhere you go. There is no "piefed content" or "lemmy content", only content. :)

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I suppose its good that there is a fediverse alternative to Lemmy. We've seen some things to be concerned about from the authors of Lemmy. Should Lemmy go too far, there's an active alternative in place to take over.

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

!lego@piefed.social is an example of Piefed commmunity

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

!lego@piefed.social is an example of Piefed commmunity

load more comments (9 replies)

This might need updating, I think the private voting feature was removed?

[-] Blaze@piefed.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Indeed, I raised to Rimu to review that page

[-] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 2 points 1 week ago
[-] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't like the fact that users receive a banner next to their name if they get downvoted a lot. This makes other people judge negatively the comment even before reading it. I think it also encourages people to keep downvoting and discourages to upvote (as what happens with mass down votes of a comment on Reddit just for the sake of doing so).

Edit: sorry for my English, it's not my native language + I just woke up

[-] rimu@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

This only effects about 3.5% of accounts.

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
147 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

42649 readers
349 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS