115
Debian Plans Long-Awaited Wiki Modernization
(linuxiac.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
115 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
12421 readers
274 users here now
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
What's more modern than mediawiki? For me, it's as modern as it gets. There are great themes
It always felt a little clunky to me. I'm also not sure if it supports Markdown.
It isn't bad don't get me wrong but I also think it could be improved.
MediaWiki doesnt natively support Markdown, but there's an extension called "MarkdownExtraParser" that adds it - I had to use it for our team wiki last year and it works surpisingly well.
MediaWiki works on wikitext and templates (and will also accept HTML elements, but deference is almost always given to the former two instead). There's no reason for it to support Markdown, as it can do everything Markdown can and more, and the VisualEditor extension (shipped by default) gives you a WYSIWYG editing experience should you not want to edit the source directly.
It's just like wikipedia