1215
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Yeah, that matches my experience on public transport alright.

Crammed in so tight you can't even bend a knee, and god help you if you're travelling with luggage or groceries...

That's not really a car issue, that's a "no-one invests in public transport" issue.

[-] Genius@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago

People don't invest in public transit because they have cars. Imagine if cars were banned. People would be falling over themselves to improve the systems they need to use every day.

[-] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

No they wouldn't.... They'd be trying to find new jobs, because they would no longer be able to manage their commutes.

99% of folks driving during rush hour do not want to be driving - they're given the option of a 1 hour commute or a 2 hour cycle. You'd need a societal shift away from working to manage this.

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

That's more complicated, similar to 99% of americans want free healthcare, but then if you frame it as "the government will run it" or " might benefit" or "the government wants to take away your health insurance", then the numbers start to dwindle and a vocal minority get extremely worked up.

It is in the interest of 99% of Americans, but you still have to lead them there.

[-] Genius@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

Por que no los dos?

[-] limelight79@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Are you sure? I've heard that many drivers that support public transit, support it for everyone else. They'll still want to drive but the roads will be clear because everyone else will be on public transit!

[-] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Uhh, re-read my post. The reply here does not follow.

[-] limelight79@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

99% of folks driving during rush hour do not want to be driving

Your comment I was replying to.

[-] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Ah, fair enough (needed the clarity there).

I'll disagree there since every driver wishes there was better cheap public transport. Chilling on a bus with a book beats focusing on the half asleep gal in front who has yet to learn how indicators work.

[-] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

Also too many public transport is being treated like a business, where you optimally want to cut expense therefore always reduce frequency until the vehicle is crammed to full capacity.

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
1215 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

12775 readers
1017 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS