442
submitted 2 weeks ago by fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 weeks ago

But aside from that, this seems like a good thing.

I'm really not sure about that, even if not considering the relation of people from that age to personalized manipulative social media.

[-] gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com 21 points 2 weeks ago

If you pay (edit: income) tax, you should have the right to vote. I'm not convinced by all of the catastrophizing about it. Turning 16 unlocks a lot of rights and privileges in the UK and I have faith that teenagers won't be the reason that quality of life worsens.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

everyone who buys something in a shop also pays tax, because of VAT. should little Billy, 9 years old, be able to vote because ma' asked him to help her and buy a loaf of bread?

other options include either making it so that teens under 18 can work tax free, or banning people under 18 from working for money (probably the same as the other point practically while also enraging the teens), but I'm afraid that would incentivise more work instead of studying and socialization.

so, by this logic, we either fuck up their youth, ban them from working, or fuck up the whole country with even more voting gullible people.

[-] gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com 12 points 2 weeks ago

Sorry, I meant income tax. So little Billy will not be able to vote. My bad, Billy.

[-] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I knew what you meant, I also think that statement was wrong just for the fact that the money Billy used was not his own anyway.

The only issue i see with income tax is what about the people who don't earn any income?

[-] gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not advocating for paying income tax being a requirement to vote, that's ridiculous.

I'm arguing that people who are 16 are already afforded many of the rights and responsibilities (such as being able to work, join the military, get married with a parent's permission, etc.) that come with the concept of "adulthood" and so they should also be allowed to vote.

You're entirely missing the implicit reasoning behind my position with this comment. Hopefully you'll understand it more now that I've spelled it out, but if you still disagree, honestly I don't care and this is happening regardless.

[-] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Nope, not at all. I agree with you. I was just throwing crap out there as a hypothetical to what was said.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

You realize your argument here is the same argument used against women being able to vote and black people being able to vote and a numerous others right? They're too gullible. They're not intelligent enough. They'll just do what they're told. All arguments that we've heard before.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

I don't agree. I think it's a pretty glaring large difference that we don't ban anyone from voting for life, but until they at least start to get mature, with an age limit that is the same across white young man, white young woman and black young people.

Honestly I have no idea whatsoever how did you conclude that I'm racist. I really can't help but think that you have already decided that I and everything I think is bad.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 13 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe but electoral outcomes can take decades to work out the consequences they have to live with, so it makes some sense.to allow them to have a voice.

When i voted my first time at 18 i wasn't engaged in either the process or the candidates, it took another couple years, so maybe by the time they're 18-20 they will take it seriously and be more engaged rather then by the time i was 22-24.

As a 60 yr old, lefty, I don't think an 80 yr old should have the vote. They had their chance for many, many decades.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

When i voted my first time at 18 i wasn't engaged in either the process or the candidates, it took another couple years, so maybe by the time they're 18-20 they will take it seriously and be more engaged rather then by the time i was 22-24.

I had the same experience at 18, and it wasn't even a decade ago. this is a reason I think we should increase the age limit, if we touch it at all.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So much this. 16 year olds rarely know (or care) much about politics, AT ALL.

This will make it much more likely that young people will acquire the habit of not voting.

Make them wait till they want it.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Having said that, I'm finding some of the arguments the other way here fairly convincing.

But conversely, I remember in 2010 I asked a youth group what they thought the main parties were about. They said that Labour were about making education better and the Conservatives were about making the NHS better. None of them remembered that the Conservatives massively underfunded the NHS and always prioritised tax cuts over public services. I was right. They were wrong.

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
442 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48867 readers
1459 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS