46
submitted 3 weeks ago by naiki@slrpnk.net to c/energy@slrpnk.net

I mean im guessing its because it may not be as profitable, or atleast at first, boycotts or directly just capitalism fucking everything up? i legit always imagine aliens seeing us still use coal while having DISCOVERED IN 1932

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jagermo@feddit.org 6 points 3 weeks ago

f nuclear energy allowed a country to decarbonate, it could "afford" a Chernobyl per year

Or, you know, invest in renewables, better international grids and sodium-based storage instead of bring fine with turning part of your country into a wasteland...

[-] keepthepace@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 weeks ago

It took 40 years to have solar energy and batteries up to the task, and we are not there yet. Yes, it could have been a choice to more massively invest in R&D in these fields, but you still need electricity while you shut down nuclear plants. Don't do it unless you are ready to replace them with something else than coal. We are not there yet. Germany relies on France's nuclear capabilities to import electricity at night.

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
46 points (100.0% liked)

Green Energy

3145 readers
29 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS