696
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] adry@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago

Plus, "where was the father? huh??" I understand they could've separated, but he still had responsibilities towards this baby. So, only if the journalists had confirmed he was deceased long ago it would make sense to make this omission... but they should said so.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Seems like the authorities didn't release a lot of actionable details to the press. They only see the baby and have a short description of the scene. Not where the scene was or the identity of anyone or a hint as to how the mother died. The journalists are simply reporting the partial story without anything further to go on at the moment. The press likely will be bored of the incident well before the details would be available.

this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
696 points (100.0% liked)

childfree

2380 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS