390
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

if you're a cyclist you just can't win lol

I always cycle on the pavement. it's less busy than the road most of the time and if there's someone in front of me I ring my bell to alert them just in case

[-] Kobibi@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If I'm walking on the pavement and a cyclist rings their bell to make me get out of their way, I'm gonna get mad

I know cars suck. But you're meant to cycle on the road - You're not supposed to cycle on the pavement. I don't care if you do if the road is horrible, fair play, but ringing your bell at me? It's my right of way, so no thanks

[-] brisk@aussie.zone 3 points 3 months ago

Bicycle bells are to make people aware of your presence, not to tell them to get out of the way.

I know cars suck. But you're meant to cycle on the road

This is not true everywhere.

[-] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

If you're biking at the appropriate speed for being near pedestrians, you don't need to alert of your presence because you are no danger.

You only need to alert your presence if you're going faster than what is safe to do, which is being a dick and pedestrians are right to be mad at you.

[-] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 2 points 3 months ago

Cycling on the pavement can be a lot safer. people on bikes have been knocked over by buses and cars when they're cycling on the road. i ring my bell if there's someone in front of me walking with their back turned and can't see me

[-] Kobibi@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Cyclists ringing their bell at pedestrians on the pavement is like cars honking their horns at cyclists in a bike lane

It's not your space, so don't impose on the people using it properly

I'm sorry that roads can be bad for cyclists, but making the pavement bad for pedestrians isn't the answer

[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 7 points 3 months ago

To be clear, you're complaining about entitled drivers while demanding pedestrians get out of your way on a highway you're not supposed to be on in the first place?

[-] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I ring the bell to get their attention so they know I'm coming. if they're walking in front of me and have their back turned the bell gets their attention. as I said cyclists just can't win no matter what they do lol. also I'm a petite woman with an equally tiny bike so it's not like I take up the whole pavement

[-] GoldenFigApple@feddit.uk 4 points 3 months ago

I get shocked when I'm on a pavement and a cyclist rings a bell at me, so if I'm cycling on a pavement I either stop and wait till the person is past me or dismount and walk past the pavement. Pedestrian priority.

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 months ago

I cycle in the middle of the road as the highway code intended. Keeps me most visible and reduces dangerous overtaking, plus gives me more swerving space.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 3 months ago

My feeling is that unless there is a bike lane you should go on the pavement. You're not going to hit a pedestrian, not if you've been careful, and the roads are just not set up for cyclists.

However if there is a cycle lane, and as long as cars aren't parked in it, you should be using it.

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
390 points (100.0% liked)

Casual UK

3491 readers
362 users here now

Casual UK

A casual place for banter and anything that doesn't fit in anywhere else.

Have chat and a natter. Talk about anything and everything that's not political!

Keep it casual.

Rules

Other communities:

Here:

Elsewhere:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS