56
submitted 4 months ago by Zerush@lemmy.ml to c/science@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 months ago

And then they used the word "could" which made it all meaningless blather and conjecture. Science for likes and clicks, who needs a fuckin' hypothesis, amirite?

[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 12 points 4 months ago

who needs a fuckin’ hypothesis

everyone. Its how theories are formed,

but yes science journalism is shitty and intentionally fails,0 to indicate the difference between an idea, hypothesis and theory. Just to gain clicks.

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago

Well, it's not a simple page with science journalism, it's the official page of the European Space Agency (ESA), not TikToc or YouTube. It's certainly a hypothesis, but for sure it's not something that cannot be taken seriously.

this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
56 points (100.0% liked)

Science

18001 readers
30 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS