22

Stumbling through getting a proper backup regime in place. I have an unraid system running a proper array, and am trying to setup backups for two separate machines (one windows one debian). I've successfully setup a file share, and have duplicati running. Are there disadvantages to just setting the network folder as the destination for the backup? It seems a little hamfisted (and the data rates are terrible).

It seems like there's probably a better way to do this...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

I think you're asking about the Samba share? If it works, there's no real downside except the speed and general wonkiness of the SMB protocol.

As I would rank the different options:

  1. Rsync+SSH would be fastest if you're sending entire directories and not packaging first. A bit slower if sending huge files.
  2. NFS would be fastest if sending prepackaged large files, but overall slower if sending a bunch of smaller files
  3. SMB will be slowest in any scenario, but may be easier for you
[-] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

SMB isn't really all that slow these days.

I have NFS and SMB shares set up (same directory) and copying files to/from them maxes out my gigabit LAN.

SSH on the other hand is slower, because there's more CPU overhead.

All data and benchmarks would disagree with you. If you find something showing that SMB isn't slower than the others mentioned, I'd love to see it.

[-] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I disagree with the other person, rsync + ssh is faster even in my own benchmarks. But samba is plenty fast enough these days, I can easily have it max out my gigabit network so I don't need anything faster. So for me (and I would guess the majority of people) speed really isn't a concern anymore, so I use samba because it's easy to use and it makes sharing network folders to anything else a breeze.

It's like phones. Yeah technically the newest iPhone is faster than this years budget Samsung. But when's the last time your phone was actually a bottleneck? (Unless you're one of those people who play games, in which case, actually please respond cause I could use some really nice idle city builders for my phone pls)

[-] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Real world usage tells me all I need to know.

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

46672 readers
481 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS