744
Ruleization (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 week ago by StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee 130 points 1 week ago

We have three options here:

All dairy products are actually non-dairy equivalents that happened to just take the original names.

There are equally intelligent milk-producing species that either keep themselves in a milk producing state or are otherwise forced into said state.

Or

There is an unseen slave caste of lesser intelligent members of species that are harvested for their products.

[-] x4740N@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago

There is an unseen slave caste of lesser intelligent members of species that are harvested for their products.

This is why you don't see monkeys in zootopia

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago

Option 1: the best way to do things, but probably counts as a microaggression

Option 2.1: probably what Disney would go with

Option 2.2: the fanfiction explanation

Option 3: the grimdark version

[-] JusticeForPorygon 18 points 1 week ago

Perhaps it was option 2 or 3 originally which is why all the names are the same but over time transitioned into option 1 in a sort of abolition movement.

[-] CXORA@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago

How would option 1 be a microagression?

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I could imagine the dairy and veal industry being a very sore subject for cows in zootopia, and casual references to dairy products might be a painful barb for them.

[-] CXORA@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Isn't option 1 all dairy products being non dairy? I'm sorry am i just particularly slow?

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It is, but they retain the same names as dairy products did. If it was option 4, the cows in society would be separate from the milked creatures, so they might be totally unaffected by thinking about the dairy industry. It is unpleasant for different reasons, though

[-] CXORA@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

All mammals produce milk, not just cows.

Assuming zootopia never had a cows milk industry, dairy wouldn't be wrongly assumed to just mean bovine milk.

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

That’s what I’m saying. I’m interpreting “original names” to mean that they used to be made out of cow dairy products (instead of just happening on the same names we use), so option three is the only one where the cows in society might be totally unconnected to the dairy industry.

[-] Cenotaph@mander.xyz 37 points 1 week ago

lmao #3 is how they do it in bojack horseman. There's an intelligent chicken who has a "lesser" dumb chicken farm

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

And those "lesser" chickens are created by injecting chickens after birth with something that makes them essentially mentally disabled, though they are still sentient

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 6 days ago

You know what?

Bojack should be depressed. His whole society should be destroyed. I'm glad I stopped watching the sad horse show.

[-] musubibreakfast@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago

It was a source of joy for me. I still miss the sad horse.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

based on all the shit that cars 2 not only implies but explicitly shows on screen (genetically inferior racial underclass hell-bent on destruction of the civilised world, engine transphobia, sentient beings welded in place to do their work, force-feeding a man until his heart literally explodes out of his body, cartholicism), i would not at all be surprised if it turned out to be 3.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Option 4.

It’s a planet of the apes situation.

this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
744 points (100.0% liked)

196

17781 readers
454 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS