113
submitted 3 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

Your only argument was essentially "it has capitalism in the name!".

Now you just have "nuh-uh"

[-] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

No. I defined what's socialism for me (owning of the mean of production by the workers), and all can see that the USSR and friends weren't that. Then I gave Marx's definition of socialism, even if I'm not Marxist (a mode of production were the usefulness replaced the price as value), and all can see that the USSR and friends weren't that. Thus they're something else, and I used a term that Lenin himself used: state capitalism (which wasn't limited to the NEP). Please stop with your strawmen.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

If your definition of socialism is "ownership by the workers, but they can't form any kind of representative body to administrate production (ie. a state)", then you've just defined socialism out of existence. Unless the expecting the entire population to come together and form a consensus on every decision, ("what color should we make the wall paper? Oh well time to get all eight billion humans on a group call").

[-] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

If you think workers had anything to say in the USSR, you're delusional.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

You can drop the ableism, and the proletariat ran the government in the USSR. The democratic structure looked like this:

[-] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago
[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

It's factually true, but you don't like it, so time to deploy the thought terminating cliche

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

You can also read historical texts like Soviet Democracy by Pat Sloan, as well. There's also tons of information from the Soviet Archives, we know quite well that this is accurate information. Labelling everything that goes against your understanding as "propaganda" without doing the legwork to prove it is shallow.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

K. Very compelling point. "If you disagree with me you are mentally unwell."

But you've already condemned any representative representative body administrating things, so I'm not sure what your point is anyway.

[-] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Disagreements on opinions and beliefs are sane, normal and even cool. I love a good debate! Disagreements on facts aren't.

But you've already condemned any representative representative body administrating things

No, I never did that.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Well the fact is that you're wrong. So if you try to say you're right, it means you're insane.

No, I never did that

Yes, you did. That's a fact, by the way, so you claiming otherwise is just you being unwell.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
113 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

50413 readers
513 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS