338

Source (Bluesky)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] oxysis 16 points 1 day ago

No such thing as “ethical regurgitative (what the morons call generative) ai”. If the model has even a single work not properly licensed and/or paid for then it is exploitive and should not be legal

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 5 points 23 hours ago

I’m late to the party. I’ve only come across the term “regurgitative AI” today, but as of now I’ve seen it twice. I love it (the term, not the process)

[-] oxysis 3 points 23 hours ago

I’ve been using it for a long time now, personally never heard anyone else use it to describe them. Always thought it to be a more appropriate term to describe how they actually work

[-] LwL@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

It is more appropriate for llms, but not for diffusion models (imagegen). Those are more throw shit at a wall and refine it a thousand times (whereas llms just grab shit that looks similar to what they want). It's why generated images usually look normal at a glance and fall apart the moment you pay attention to details, because the AI judges the whole image to be close enough to training images that match the prompt instead of having any intent behind individual parts.

load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 18 May 2025
338 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

2818 readers
1185 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS