253

I am aware of

  • Sea-lioning
  • Gaslighting
  • Gish-Galloping
  • Dogpiling

I want to know I theres any others I'm not aware of

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

genocide is not something you negotiate away.

Genocide is not something you stay at home for and hope it goes away on its own.

You don't get to claim the ally if all you did was nothing.

OP criticized people who stayed home (choosing to hold on to their purity) instead of voting for the candidates least likely to perpetuate futher suffering.

Going "oh no this trolley problem is so terrible I refuse to even look at the lever" is prioritizing your own moral superiority over the people tied to the tracks.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Further

genocide is not something you negotiate away.

And such imply that we are voting to start one or not. That's not on the ballot. The war has already started and we are asking people to vote for the side that cares more about ending it.

It really shows how privileged we are that we take a luxury of picking allies.

Even if someone is taking the position of total Palestine Victory the dems are the better pick as they most likely lead to being ableyto fight another day.

People who didn't vote because the dems aren't perfect are the worst allies.

Do Not Wait To Strike Till the Iron Is Hot; But Make It Hot By Striking

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

People who didn’t vote because the dems aren’t perfect

It's hard to take seriously people who describe "actively committing genocide" as "not perfect"

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Damn soldier, you have a lot of luxury commenting from the front line.

Lmk how abstaining strategy is working. Read the part I wrote about living to fight another day.

Maybe take your brain out of the box and wear it.

[-] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 2 points 2 months ago

Brain in a box literally posts like someone doing the exact thing I'm talking about. Funny huh?

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Wdym? that Box Brain wants to keep the genocide going by demonizing those that would oppose it? I've literally asked him what his plan is instead, but he keeps purity testing and insisting he is not a troll. I re-stated my position in a few words for clarity and wanting to be understood.

[-] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah exactly. He's clearly just a troll trying to get leftists/liberals to sit out because ISSUE wasn't immediately addressed. Literally that's a right wing tactic. Lol.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Easy for them not being in a city under siege.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

You are lying about me, because you cannot accept disagreement

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

You are lying about me because I disagreed with you.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

And you are on the front line? What is your point?

And no, Democrats give Palestinians no better chance of fighting another day, that just give liberals a license to pretend the genocide isn't happening.

Maybe you should take your brain out of your skull and wear it.

[-] WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This is the perfect example of the purity test OP was talking about.

Two people who couldn't be more clear in their comments how disgusted they are by this obvious ongoing genocide, but yet completely powerless to do anything about it.

One person wants to use the little power they have to steer the country as far away from genocide as they can, and the other who sees that the game is rigged and wants no part in the government claiming their consent.

What's unfortunate is that you're directed all you anger at each other since neither knows how to direct it at the people in power.

Democrats give Palestinians no better chance of fighting another day, that just give liberals a license to pretend the genocide isn't happening.

"Democrats" are not a monolith. Criticize the democrats all you want when they deny the genocide, but when we have candidates saying the following, it does feel like you're being overly pessimistic about what allies you actually do have available to you inside this broken party:

“As we speak, in this moment, 1.1 million innocents in Gaza are at famine’s door,” Ocasio-Cortez said in her speech Friday. “A famine that is being intentionally precipitated through the blocking of food and global humanitarian assistance by leaders in the Israeli government.”

If you want to know what an unfolding genocide looks like,” the New York Democrat added, “open your eyes.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

This is the perfect example of the purity test OP was talking about.

I'm comfortable "purity testing" active genocide.

Two people who couldn’t be more clear in their comments how disgusted they are by this obvious ongoing genocide, but yet completely powerless to do anything about it.

Only one of them is committing genocide denial.

What’s unfortunate is that you’re directed all you anger at each other since neither knows how to direct it at the people in power.

I'm angry at people who do genocide denial

Criticize the democrats all you want when they deny the genocide

I am, and I'm being told that I'm "purity testing"

but when we have candidates saying the following

And yet she activity supported the people committing this genocide. And even she is the absolute fringe of the democrats. The ones actually running for president support Israel fully.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I'm comfortable "purity testing" active genocide.

The reality is that you are comfortable letting Palestinians die by promoting inaction of anything that might help them.

I'm angry at people who do genocide denial

No one is denying that it is happening.

I am, and I'm being told that I'm "purity testing"I am, and I'm being told that I'm "purity testing"

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

The reality is that you are comfortable letting Palestinians die

Projection.

promoting inaction of anything that might help them.

I have never done that. Lying.

No one is denying that it is happening.

People are absolutely denying that the democrats participated in genocide.

What point are you trying to make with that screeshot?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

No one should be told they're purity testing for criticizing the democrats.

Purity testing would be saying someone can't be an ally in criticizing the democrats with you because they're an enemy for voting for them.

Someone put a coin in my hand and said "heads is genocide, tails is genocide in a different way" and I really cared about not doing genocide so I asked "can I choose none" and they said "you can walk away, but then the coin will be flipped randomly".

If you walked away from that coin flip and left the consequences to chance, I really don't have a lot of patience hearing you judge me for all the burden and anxiety I put on myself researching which option was worse so I could make the least worst choice.

Walking away seems the easy choice here. You didn't stop the genocide, you just washed your hands clean of it.

Criticizing me for choosing, instead of being an ally, saying "that was a tough choice, but don't give up **here's what we can do next" is useless.

Instead of saying we should stay home and not vote, suggest something we can do. The endless criticizing of powerless people just trying their best in a shitty situation is why you're being accused of purity testing.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

No one should be told they’re purity testing for criticizing the democrats.

Ok, well I am being. In fact, look at InternetCitizen2's posts to see him stalking me across different unrelated instances to accuse me of it, among other obviously bad faith accusations.

Purity testing would be saying someone can’t be an ally in criticizing the democrats with you because they’re an enemy for voting for them.

Again, look at his post history. I'm comfortable saying I can't be an ally with someone like that.

If you walked away from that coin flip and left the consequences to chance, I really don’t have a lot of patience hearing you judge me for all the burden and anxiety I put on myself researching which option was worse so I could make the least worst choice.

That's fine; so long as you're actually be honest about what you voted for, which is rare. Most of the people I'm talking to actively deny the Democrat's evil.

Walking away seems the easy choice here. You didn’t stop the genocide, you just washed your hands clean of it.

Atleast I'm not denying it.

Criticizing me for choosing, instead of being an ally, saying “that was a tough choice, but don’t give up **here’s what we can do next” is useless.

I'll criticize you if you deny what you chose, if you're honest about it I'll merely disagree with you.

Instead of saying we should stay home and not vote, suggest something we can do.

I'm just asking people to stop engaging in genocide denial. If lesser evil voting means rewriting history to exonerate the perpetrators of genocide, then I cannot accept it.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I’m comfortable saying I can’t be an ally with someone like that.

Because I want material benefits to Palestine? Not going "lesser of two evils" has not helped anyone. You are being a bad ally by stifling political support Palestine could have (and needs). Also I keep asking you what you real plan, so that we know if you have anything serious to say, but you keep purity trolling.

I’m just asking people to stop engaging in genocide denial. If lesser evil voting means rewriting history to exonerate the perpetrators of genocide, then I cannot accept it.

No one is denying anything. You are pretending people are.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Because I want material benefits to Palestine?

Because you're a genocide denier who abuses and attacks and lies about anyone who disagrees with you, including stalking me across multiple different instances slandering me.

You are being a bad ally by stifling political support Palestine could have (and needs)

And thats why we could never be allies: because you respond to disagreement by engaging in active slander and lies against me.

No one is denying anything. You are pretending people are.

No one is denying anything. You are pretending people are.

You have repeatedly denied that the Democrats were engaging in genocide.

See @WhatsTheHoldup? These are the kind of people I oppose.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Because you’re a genocide denier who abuses and attacks and lies about anyone who disagrees with you, including stalking me across multiple different instances slandering me.

Screenshot where I say it is not happening.

And thats why we could never be allies: because you respond to disagreement by engaging in active slander and lies against me.

We cannot because you are not serious about solutions. Please state what your position and policy proposals would be for clarity.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We cannot because you are not serious about solutions.

Neither are you, you just deny the genocide and attack people for disagreeing.

Please state what your position and policy proposals would be for clarity.

Do not engage in genocide denial and apologia, do not rewrite history to exonerate people who committed genocide. If your lesser evil position requires you to do that, it is not a viable position. That's been my sole proposition so far, and that's been so unacceptable that you've spent dozens of posts across multiple coms attacking me.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

So where in those screenshots do I say there is no genocide? Because I am saying there is and we need serious steps to stop it. Speaking about being serious; what is your real plan?

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

The bit were you denied that the Democrats were committing genocide.

Speaking about being serious; what is your real plan?

What's yours? Supporting the people doing the genocide certainly isn't a real plan.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Supporting the people doing the genocide certainly isn’t a real plan.

Supporting the place we have the most influence for a positive outcome.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Do not engage in genocide denial and apologia, do not rewrite history to exonerate people who committed genocide. If your lesser evil position requires you to do that, it is not a viable position. That’s been my sole proposition so far, and that’s been so unacceptable that you’ve spent dozens of posts across multiple coms attacking me.

Bro your answer sucks so hard when you finally say it. War is brutal and you are going to need allies that show up. Check your privileging not being in a city under siege. Your answer is "I wont do anything and watch more Palestinians die because it discomforts me". That is a complete non answer and why you are a bad ally. Because you do not show up (and you are trying to discourage those that would).

Seriously. Check your privilege. Being well fed and warm. Of course you can afford to wait.

I take it back. You are not a troll. That is too good for you. You are just pro genocide.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

What a shock that stating my position would result in you ignoring it and then making up a strawman. Just like you did last time I stated it.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Bro your answer sucks so hard when you finally say it.

"Don't do genocide denial" apaprentl "sucks", according to the genocide denier.

Your answer is “I wont do anything and watch more Palestinians die because it discomforts me”.

So once again, you didn't bother to read my post and are once again just making blatent straw-men because you cant accept disagreement.

That is a complete non answer and why you are a bad ally.

Good thing I didn't say it then, you just made it up because you can't accept disagreement.

I take it back. You are not a troll. That is too good for you. You are just pro genocide.

Again, that's you.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

So why do you want to watch genocide happen? You "plan" is literally to do nothing and watch it happen.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So once again, you didn’t bother to read my post and are once again just making blatent straw-men because you cant accept disagreement. How shocking that you once again ignored what I said to just lie.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

And you are on the front line? What is your point?

I'm telling you to put up or shut up. Making purity tests for what is a good ally for those actually dying is insanely tone deaf.

load more comments (21 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
253 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

42649 readers
365 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS