1001
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
1001 points (100.0% liked)
Uplifting News
16331 readers
33 users here now
Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.
Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It makes me question where she's funding her lifestyle.
That's bad. Real world efforts are necessary. Giving campaign funds to charity is sketchy at best when you're showing it off to pretend you're morally superior
Irrelevant as the 80 year is retiring anyways.
So? Genuinely hilarious how irrelevant this point is.
I had not heard this. However, it will not change my viewpoint that she's as this post demonstrates running an extremely questionable and too early campaign, as well as being an out of district plant by not even trying to have lived a real period of time in the district she's planning to run in.
The vast majority of the district is out of Chicago. Also, she's not campaigning in Chicago. She's campaigning online.
Any one of the points is enough to make her not worth voting for. Her being out of district alone is ridiculous. If she genuinely cared, she should be running for a district she actually lived in. You are blatantly ignoring how much an issue an out of district congressperson is. Pretending it doesn't matter just because you like the vibes of the candidate. And it really is just that and nothing more, just vibes. She has zero lower experience in politics, no record, no evidence of capability.
Especially when she's consistently astroturfing reddits, it makes me question where her actual in district relations are. If she even has any.
Yes. It's buying votes. Giving people food sith the clear implication of asking them to vote for her.
So her astroturfing is irrelevant just because it's on reddit. Ah, you're that sort of person. I don't even have reddit downloaded anymore; you're making a bold assumption on that front.
This is pure what aboutism. Seriously? You're seriously pulling what aboutism?
Yeah surely swarms of people saying only good things about her and drawing 5x more engagement on city specific subreddits than other posts is just people loving her.
I did not instantly make up bullshit about her husband. And additionally, "past jobs" are not important, past political experience is important.
It's relevant when my current representative is not. She's valued under a million dollars. You're bringing in other reps corruption
when jan was, while too old, she was not some corrupt ass mfer.
That's exactly how whataboutism works.
You're completely ignoring that she still doesn't live in district ---instead of trying to contest a republican, or someone actually determinatal, she selected a safe seat to run, in a place she does not live, and never has. that alone is a major issue.
You are the type to see gangs providing people food and disaster relief and think "yeah, it's purely good! We shouldn't question it!"
She only just moved into the state less than a year ago...
Not caring about the location is for a different political system. In ours, location is important.
What indicates that to you? You don't live here, do you know the values of the area?
I have provided explicit evidence in the form of largely out of state donations and not being in district as to show why she should not be elected in the district. As well as vote buying through using campaign funds in charity.
No, you just think it's fine for someone who has not even lived in an area to represent them. That's just a recipe for pure corruption. It means they won't actually understand the values or wants of the areas. You are simply pretending it is fine because it suits your views best
I feel like you're failing to understand that my annoyance at her not living in district is not the same issue, though it is a contributing factor, in why I think she's likely corrupt.
A complete difference in foundational thought of what makes someone a good fit for an area will go no where in discussion.
My point on her being out of district was from the start.