65
submitted 2 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 months ago

Definitionally in IEEE floating point, NaN is not equal to anything, including itself. The only real abomination here is B:

> Math.min()
Infinity
> Math.max()
-Infinity
> 
[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 months ago

I mean, B does make some amount of sense, if you realize that it's supposed to give you the maximum among the parameters (so you'd normally call it as Math.max(5, 3) === 5).

Well, and you can call that with zero parameters, because you can spread an array into it, which might have zero length. And then given these conditions, and if you don't want to throw an error, then -Infinity is kind of the least bad remaining option, as it's likely to generally work with the rest of your logic.

this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
65 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

37656 readers
138 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS