47
submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/law@lemmy.world

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas appeared on Thursday to support Donald Trump's push to curtail the power of federal judges.

The situation unfolded during Supreme Court arguments over an executive order signed by Trump that aimed to deny birthright citizenship to children born in the United States to non-citizen or non-permanent resident parents.

The Department of Justice has argued that judges on lower-level courts should only have the power to issue rulings on a specific group of people involved in a suit, and not issue nationwide injunctions.

Justice Thomas appeared to support that argument when discussing the history of universal injunctions with Solicitor General D. John Sauer. Justice Thomas asked: "So, we survived until the 1960s without universal injunctions?"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

Survivalist bias as a legal argument by a justice of the SCOTUS. Jesus. Maybe someone should ask him whether he'd even exist without civil rights.

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

IMO even holding a conversation with someone like this is a waste. His wife calls the shots. He's just out doing what he's told.

this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
47 points (100.0% liked)

Law

850 readers
49 users here now

Discussion about legal topics, centered around United States

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS