442
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tills13@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago

What in the libertarian garbage is this? Do you like roads, schools, libraries, parks, garbage pickup, etc etc etc. Property taxes pay for these things.

[-] Phoonzang@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

But those things do not scale with the (alleged) value oft the property, but with things like property size, number oft occupants, curb length etc. Or could even be billed at actual cost (your garbage example).

[-] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Why do millionaires pay more taxes than minimum-wage workers?

Whatever answer you come up to my question can probably answer yours.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

yet even if your family doesn't use these services you benefit from safe roads, educated workers, green spaces for all to have access, and public sanitation - you LITERALLY BENEFIT FROM EVERYTHING but don't want to pay.

[-] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

But your taxes don't scale with the alleged value of the property either. There are caps and protections in place. That's why they were only paying $15k previously. And they didn't just repair their old house, they put an entire second story on it. Hence the reason they triggered the "major improvements" clause.

[-] deathbird@mander.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

Tax Other Stuff

[-] mcteazy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

I think you're misunderstanding the post... He's saying property taxes are a necessary source of government revenue (that we all benefit from) but you shouldn't have to pay it if it's a primary residence and there should be a different structure or revenue stream. I agree with that, since a property tax is basically a wealth tax on ordinary people because it is a tax on their single biggest asset.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

He’s saying property taxes are a necessary source of government revenue (that we all benefit from) but you shouldn’t have to pay it if it’s a primary residence and there should be a different structure or revenue stream. I agree with that

Where do you want the revenue needed to fund the city to come from if not from property owners?

[-] deathbird@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

Workers. Employers. Commuters. Capital gains. Sales.

There are so many things you can tax, so many points where money moves from one set of hands to another where you can shave a little off the top. It's just a bit absurd to me that we will shake people down for money for just having a home that an assessor figures could sell for some particular amount of money.

[-] Master@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

No. Those things are paid for by other taxes and service fees.

this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
442 points (100.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

12169 readers
86 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS