847
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

That's a given. Else there's no need to hire a CEO.

[-] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I disagree.

AI could be CEO. That way there's no bias, malfeasance, or lack of confidence.

I don't give two fucks about shareholder's "interests." Or gambling addicts in general.

[-] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

It's not about "you" so let's don't make it about you. You don't give two fuck but shareholder, publicly traded company or otherwise, do.

[-] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

And I don't give two fucks about your investment.

See, when you become an adult, you stop being offended when other humans don't like what you like, or care about your interests.

[-] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago
this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
847 points (100.0% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

4496 readers
176 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS