2066
It's a pin job (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 28 points 1 month ago

I think what ends up happening (as a rando without a legal degree) is that the backpack and all of its contents become inadmissible as evidence. It makes beyond a reasonable doubt harder to achieve for the prosecution because they lack a proposed murder weapon in evidence.

[-] bss03@infosec.pub 22 points 1 month ago

This is just a motion. Judge will decide it's validity and the remedy. It might end up with the evidence excluded, but it might be that the prosecution just has to provide a different/stronger justification, or even be a nothing burger if the judge is unconvinced by the arguments in the motion.

I agree with your analysis if the judge does exclude backpack and contents as evidence.

Anything other than exclusion will be grounds for appeal, later, too.

this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
2066 points (100.0% liked)

Luigi Mangione

2207 readers
34 users here now

A community to post anything related to Luigi Mangione.

This is not a pro-murder community. Please respect Lemmy.world ToS.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS