1617
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
1617 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
69804 readers
3084 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Oh they had roadside billboards in 1950. And they were a blight back then. Advertising is a cancer.
Extremism is cancer.
Haha what? I'm not burning billboards and slaughtering CEOs. I'm just sick to death of all these ads. Advertising is a distributed global brainwashing campaign, by the wealthy, against the working class. They don't hire psychologists to exploit our lizard brains for no reason, and that's why it needs to be outlawed.
That’s a generalization. The White Rose was doing “advertising”, and I think that’s all but “by the wealthy, against the working class”.
Advertising has its place and can be beneficial to society, it just needs regulations (admittedly, A LOT of them).
The advertising industry had their chance to run an ethical business model.
Now they have their own corporate spy agencies and propaganda networks.
I know, and that sucks. But outright banning something that has its benefits has always been detrimental (not to mention, they’d just find sneakier ways to do it and it’d be worse for everyone). We need regulations, a lot of them, not banning entirely.
Plus who are we kidding, everyone in power is so deep into the advertising/propaganda industry that neither of those options have a decent chance of happening in our lifetime.
Oh I certainly wasn't proposing a practical transition method away from it. Nor do I think our authorities would willingly give up that gravy train. I'm just saying it's an offense against freedom, privacy, and informed consent. Frankly, aadvertising threatens the stability of civilization itself, and it must be reigned in to ensure any kind of positive future. But a near total ban would be even better.
Your local mom & pop store also uses advertising smart guy.
You mean that local mom and pop store that was briefly allowed to exist to maintain the illusion before they got crushed by a corporate juggernaut?
When a society allows itself to be psychologically manipulated in such an all pervasing manner, the people participate in their own subjugation and call it freedom.
There exists one of the most powerful groups on the planet who considers it their right to sneak inside your mind to twist your decision making ability to whatever amoral ends they like. They pump their filth into your head your every waking hour, and they'll get into your dreams once they have the technology. Rather than revulsion and disgust, your reaction to this is "ok, but maybe just a little less than they do now."
What a surprise.
No. There is nowhere in the world more sacred than our own minds, and no one else has the right to worm their way inside, en masse, to alter them as they will.
How about you speak for yourself instead of speaking for others? all I stated is that advertising isn't inherently evil by itself and you go putting words in my mouth about other shit.
Your reaction to that was not to consider a single word I said, but to take offense.
I wonder why
I dont.
@RedditIsDeddit @Olhonestjim If ads were banned, they wouldn't have to.