49
submitted 4 days ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Switched to Librewolf a few months ago, no regrets.

[-] aleq@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

Isn't librewolf building on the latest versions of firefox or gecko or something? So if firefox does, so does librewolf?

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yep, that's the problem with browsers. They cost so much to maintain that their primary contributors are earning money through other means to keep the projects going. Gecko and Chromium are open-source, backed by Google money on both ends, but even then almost all of the non-corporate browser projects are just forks of one or the other.

Other than Safari, which is closed source and only on Apple's walled garden, Ladybird is the only non-Chromium, non-Gecko browser I can think of, and it needs a LOT of work.

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

It's a fork, so they can choose what to incorporate from Mozilla or not. If they go "bad" at anytime I'll just switch again.

[-] Feyd@programming.dev 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The point is that librewolf is downstream of Firefox. They are not equipped to maintain an entire browser if Firefox goes the way of the dodo

this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
49 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

4999 readers
4 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS