432
submitted 2 years ago by Dazza@lemmy.world to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

A case like this should be ironclad, though. "Beyond all reasonable doubt" is the standard for criminal charges. I wouldn't want people to be convicted of life-ruining crimes based on non-ironclad cases.

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I'm saying the evidence doesn't just have to be "ironclad" enough for a guilty verdict, it has to be so overwhelming that the outcome of the trial can be reasonably certain before a case is made. Why would I argue for the standard for evidence in a trial to be lessened? That doesn't make sense.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
432 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38173 readers
524 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS