5
"Cultural Tradition"
(slrpnk.net)
Why native plants?
According to the The National Audubon Society:
Restoring native plant habitat is vital to preserving biodiversity. By creating a native plant garden, each patch of habitat becomes part of a collective effort to nurture and sustain the living landscape for birds and other animals.
What our community is about—
This community is for everyone who is interested in planting native species in their garden. Come here for discussions, questions, and sharing of ideas/photos.
Rules:
More for you to explore—
It resonates with me but more in the way of it being interesting to think about where the line should be drawn. Like is vodka traditional to Russia? Potatoes to Ireland? Tomato sauce to Italy or curry to India? Because I consider them trafitional even though none of the ingredients are native to the countries listed.
I feel like tradition is never isolated to itself. One culture influences another culture influences another. So like someone could argue curry isn't traditional in India because of the use of American ingredients. And could argue Jamaican curry isn't traditional because it came from Indian sugar cane workers. And Japanese curry isn't authentic either because it was introduced to them through the British after their colonization of India.
Also I just wanna emphasize that I'm not trying to downplay what you said; I think it's a super interesting question and one worth talking about!
Now I wonder at what point an old culture can be considered superseded by a new one. If colonisation wipes out the traditions of a culture to the point that no one remembers them, and the people only know the crops introduced during times of colonisation, and the indigenous peoples become united and speak a new language (e.g. English), can that be considered the start of a new culture with new traditions that involve non-native plants?
A thought-provoking topic indeed.
Personally I think what is left after a colonial genocide could definitely be considered a new culture, but I feel like it depends on how the people within it identify. Like sticking with the topic of indigenous peoples, the loss of traditions and language is a big deal, but that doesn't mean that the culture is different. Carrying on with whatever fidelity is possible seems like a fair way to cobsider yourself a continuation instead of a whole new deal.
Sorry if that's incoherent lol I'm not running at 100% today. I like talking about semantics
All good. I don't think that there is a single correct answer to this.