1438

submitted 1 year ago by Napain@lemmy.ml to c/196

321 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] lemmington_steele@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

and the most interesting part of the whole situation is that the other side most likely thinks the same

[-] OwenEverbinde@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Except there's no need to hypothesize about what the "the other side" wants. They have been perfectly vocal about what they think are issues that need to be "solved":

Accurate history lessons
Transgender people
Women's ability to have deadly ectopic pregnancies removed
"Urban" people
The right to protest against the flag
Gay people

If you have enough knowledge of history to know what a "final solution" looks like, you are justified in seeing "the other side" as the main problem.

[-] Laticauda@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Not really. Right wingers seem to like centrists.

[-] BigNote@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

But since these are mutually exclusive propositions, only one side can actually be correct. Do you really think it's more likely to be the science-denying conspiracy-minded side? The side that elected a transparent con man and buffoon, and appears to want to elect him again?