390

We should be pushing for legislation for Ranked Choice Voting (r.50501.chat)

submitted 1 week ago by FiftyFiftyOne@50501.chat to c/Mirror@50501.chat

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Ranked choice voting (RCV) — also known as instant runoff voting (IRV) — makes our elections better by allowing voters to rank candidates in order of preference.

RCV is straightforward: Voters have the option to rank candidates in order of preference: first, second, third and so forth. If your first choice doesn’t have a chance to win, your ballot counts for your next choice.

RCV works in all types of elections and supports more representative outcomes. RCV means better choices, better campaigns, and better representation.

Originally Posted By u/Albany50501 At 2025-04-22 02:51:32 PM | Source

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The single transferable vote is way better:

The single transferable vote (STV) or proportional-ranked choice voting (P-RCV) is a multi-winner electoral system in which each voter casts a single vote in the form of a ranked ballot. Voters have the option to rank candidates, and their vote may be transferred according to alternative preferences if their preferred candidate is eliminated or elected with surplus votes, so that their vote is used to elect someone they prefer over others in the running. STV aims to approach proportional representation based on votes cast in the district where it is used, so that each vote is worth about the same as another.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote

[-] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

I like that. I'm still going to support any improvement to the system, though, even if it's not my preferred solution. Even, if we just got ranked-choice voting, we'd still have more influence on further improvements to the system, like moving to STV.