I looked through you comment history. It's impressive how many times you repeat this mantra and while people fownvote you and correct you on bad faith, you keep doing it.

Why? I think you have a hard time realizing that people may have another definition of AI than you. If you don't agree with thier version, you should still be open to that possibility. Just spewing out your take doesn't help anyone.

For me, AI is a broad gield of maths, including ALL of Machine Learning but also other fields, such as simple if/else programming to solve a very specific task to "smarter" problem solving algorithms such as pathfinding or other atatistical methods for solving more data-heavy problems.

Machine Learning has become a huge field (again all of it inside the field of AI). A small but growing part of ML is LLM, which we are talking about in this thread.

All of the above is AI. None of it is AGI - yet.

You could change all of your future comments to "None of this is "AGI"" in order to be more clear. I guess that wouldn't trigger people as much though...

If automatically generated documentation is a grift I need to know what you think isn't a grift.