322
Naming (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This is a dumb take. Its like saying "math is stupid, because its just a made up system so it doesnt really prove that 1+1=2"

Some things are just factually provable and leave no space for unscientific opinions. Not everything is a philosophical question.

"Giving starving people food makes them less likely to die." doesnt require anyones opinion. Its just fact.

If people use "rational" to mean their personal opinion, then you just disregard those people, but not the concept of rationality.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 months ago

Do you realize that there's philosophies out there called "Objectivism" and "Rationalism"? Your rebuke makes no fucking sense. You're fighting against a strawman.

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You're trying to teach a pig to sow*.

[-] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

You are mistaken as to the philosophy being discussed. This is about Rationalism as conceived of by Yudkowsky the guy who managed to convince a bunch of techbros that he’s a genius despite having no high school education.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago

Oh okay so people just abused a word to mean something that it doesnt and it caught on. Wonderful.

[-] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah, the guy who coined it has nothing past 8th grade so it is yet again a poorly educated IAmVerySmart type with racist notions leading the right like Limbaugh before him.

this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
322 points (100.0% liked)

Philosophy

1605 readers
33 users here now

Discussion of philosophy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS