533

Are there any Lemmy/Mbin instances by women for women? (europe.pub)

submitted 3 months ago by tfm@europe.pub to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

219 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Reddit post

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] tfm@europe.pub 26 points 3 months ago

I definitely think it should be an inclusive, not exclusive space

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 22 points 3 months ago

blahaj.zone is a great one I've found. Extremely inclusive, brooks absolutely no bullshit from bad faith actors.

Is also very very queer tho JSYK

[-] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 6 points 3 months ago

Is also very very queer tho JSYK

That could be our new Lemmy slogan.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Either can describe a bar that throws out Nazis or a Nazi bar, depending on perspective.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 10 points 3 months ago

now you're just being dickish.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Nah I'm demanding clarity. A clear question "Do you mean excluding TERFs or excluding women" and the answer is "I want to be inclusive". It may not be meant as such, and I'm definitely not implying that it was, but that's exactly how a TERF would evade questioning.

A clear "Fuck TERFs" would have provided plenty of clarity, and been much shorter. Also, it would have said "Fuck TERFs".

[-] LwL@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Idk man "exclusionary" is literally part of terf I don't think there's much ambiguity there. Fuck terfs though.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

They're also complaining about "women being excluded from women's spaces by agents of the patriarchy posing as women". They're also not necessarily using "TERF" as a label. They're using typical fascist-style "words mean whatever we want them to mean in the moment" type of stuff, hiding clear-cut positions behind pretend nuance, hence why I favour clarity.