"Since we are talking about aggregating documents into an index, the word semigroup might pop into our heads."
This is why Haskell tutorials have a bad rep. Why not use a common English term like "monoid" instead?
Snark aside, the <> approach to solving the problem piecewise and aggregating the results into a larger instance of the same type is a really convenient approach.
"Since we are talking about aggregating documents into an index, the word semigroup might pop into our heads."
This is why Haskell tutorials have a bad rep. Why not use a common English term like "monoid" instead?
Snark aside, the
<>approach to solving the problem piecewise and aggregating the results into a larger instance of the same type is a really convenient approach.Not only is it convenient, it also enables parallelism:
"How to Think about Parallel Programming: Not!" - Guy L. Steele Jr. (Strange Loop 2010)
Yes! Steele's Fortress-era talks are amazing. Really thought-provoking.
Yes! Steele's Fortress-era talks are amazing. Really thought-provoking.