630
Rule (ani.social)
submitted 5 days ago by sag@ani.social to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] petrol_sniff_king 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The only reason you care about the wikipedia article you linked me is because it is a technical defense of the modern thing people are obviously pissed about.

So you're right, I don't really care; it has nothing to do with what we're talking about.

[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

I've been into generative art since before generative AI was a thing. And for the record I do like generative art much more than I like AI art. I don't actually even specially like AI art as a form of artistic expression. But the fact that I don't like an art style or more specifically a way of doing art is just my particular taste. Generative art have great differences with AI art. As generative algorithms are hand made by the artist, while in AI art the algorithms are made as a generic tool and artists change the initial inputs but don't really change the algorithm that much, specially on a deeper level. Also AI art is "based" on other art, while generative art is it's own thing, is not "pre-trained".

But it's an interesting point of discussion, as it's also computer made with great randomisation, and once the algorithm is made an almost infinite works can be made with little effort without an human "opera".

[-] petrol_sniff_king 2 points 2 days ago

As generative algorithms are hand made by the artist, while in AI art the algorithms are made as a generic tool

So, you agree they're different.

I feel compelled to ask this, as if I am pulled into it by the sheer gravity of this question: why did you bring it up, then?

[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

They are different but they share characteristics.

I brought it up because some guy said that art made without direct human input and knowledge of the end result is not art. And while different in many other things both AI art and generative art share that characteristic.

Imagine the next example, some people may want to say that pixel art is not real art because it does not allow for complex detailing. The. i may ask if they think that watercolor is also "not art" because it also doesn't allow for great detailing .

[-] petrol_sniff_king 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

As generative algorithms are hand made by the artist,

Oh, would you look at that, intentionality. Maybe they don't share that characteristic.

this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
630 points (100.0% liked)

196

17448 readers
1025 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS