2462
submitted 4 months ago by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/world@lemmy.world

One of the men goes for her phone. The other grabs at her hands. Ozturk screams. Shock and fear ripple through her voice. Two masked women join them, tugging at her backpack, peeling the straps from her shoulders. “I’m going somewhere, I need to call someone,” she pleads. “We’re the police. Relax,” one of the men says in response.

They surround her. Then, one by one, they pull their neck gaiters up to cover their faces. “You don’t look like police,” a voice off screen says. “Why are you hiding your faces?” The questions continue, but the figures don’t respond. Instead, they cuff Ozturk, cross the street, and put her in an unmarked SUV. She is gone.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 192 points 4 months ago

Look at their body language.

These aren't law enforcement professionals detaining a suspect.

These are Nazi Brown Shirt thugs ganging up on a fucking PhD student.

This country is nosediving HARD. Arm yourselves. I would never allow plain-clothed thugs to push me into an unmarked van and take me to a secondary location. You are fighting for your life at that point for all you know.

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 46 points 4 months ago

As much as I agree, resisting is likely going to escalate the situation beyond what most people are willing to deal with.

Face it, very few people have the knowledge and skill required to even put up a fight against anyone that is prepared for that encounter.

I get why the victim here didn't really fight back. I get why she let them take her away. I understand the fear she was probably feeling in that moment, and it can be paralysing for someone who isn't prepared to fight for their life and doesn't have the knowledge, skill, or experience required to handle the situation.

To be clear: I'm not saying this victim is dumb, inexperienced, or lacks general life experience, I would argue quite the opposite, in fact. The problem is that they don't have the knowledge, skill, and experience with confrontations. I'm certain, beyond any doubt, that this person was very intelligent, skilled and experienced; just not with physical confrontation.

This is shameful behavior. Why did they feel the need to ambush a bookworm? Not to insult them so all but they are clearly more of an intellectual person than a combative person.

Disclaimer: I'm not American, I'm just empathetic to those that get disappeared in the middle of the day by people wearing all black without so much as a badge being flashed.

[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

Escalation is the point. People weren't upset when police beat and harassed people.

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

That's just it. Police beat and harass people and the public barely takes note. So fighting back and getting beaten isn't really going to move the needle here in terms of public support. Those that would be outraged by someone getting disappeared in broad daylight by thugs in all black with masks on, that are claiming to be law enforcement, will also be outraged by anything more significant. From a public support standpoint, you don't gain a lot of attention by fighting back and getting beaten.

Honestly, someone should go to the local PD and report that person as missing/abducted.

To be clear: anyone with the skillset, knowledge and experience to effectively stand their ground against these kinds of people, absolutely should.

Unless they clearly identify themselves and show proof (badges and documents) that prove their claims of being law enforcement, you should 100% fight back against being kidnapped by these thugs. They are little more than a gang with government funding if they're not doing things "by the book" so to speak.

As far as I can see, most of this kind of thing that's been happening lately is more based on feelings and assumptions by a small group who is going around mostly unchecked, doing a lot of damage. If the police/LEO crowd had a PR problem with BLM (and all related incidents including protests) then this is going to be a complete shit storm when it finally hits the fan, which might be four years from now....

On an individual level, I completely understand why someone untrained and unprepared would want to avoid any harm coming to them by complying, regardless of who the perpetrator is. Whether police, FBI, homeland security, secret service or some other form of LEO, or simply an organized gang of thugs.... Self preservation is going to be the main goal. Far be it for me to fault someone for doing what they feel is going to give them the best outcome in that scenario.

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

It's a tough call honestly. So far it doesn't seem like they are killing the people they take. If the person was armed, and tries to use it to defend themselves, they very likely will get killed. As other have commented, these appear to be basically thugs. Likely with less training then police officers, and certainly with less oversight. So people need to choose what they want to avoid most. Death, or incarceration with a chance of getting out. I would hate to have to make that choice myself.

[-] tankfox@midwest.social 32 points 4 months ago

The killing starts when they become more confident that there won't be any consequences for their actions.

[-] smoresrock@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Nazi? You, sir, are ridiculous and have no sense of nationalism. Hamas, who would not have your back or mine, is quite obviously the problem in Palestine, and this PhD student (as if that makes a difference) is supporting the wrong side. The US is revoking visas of Hamas supporters. Hence, she's being detained to ultimately have her visa revoked. What part of that aren't you following?

[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 29 points 4 months ago
[-] smoresrock@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago
[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 13 points 4 months ago

Well, you did out yourself.

[-] Stamau123@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

What part of that aren’t you following?

The part where she isn't a hamas supporter, and was abducted by the secret police for writing an op-ed on how Tufts should divest money from Israel.

[-] smoresrock@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I regret to say that you are sorely misinformed. Although what you said is also true, the allegations are, in fact, that she's a Hamas supporter.

There are other supporting facts that she's absolutely a Hamas supporter, including the one you brought up. If she's in support of divesting money from Israel, that's obviously anti-Israel. Who is anti-Israel? Muslims. What are Hamas people? Muslim. She's also obviously Muslim. All signs point in the same direction. How dense do you have to be to not see this?

I implore you to stop parroting what your ignorant leftist peers are saying and do some quick research. You even have AI chatbots to verify my claims at your disposal for crying out loud.

[-] Ghost_Pepper@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

You don't have to be Muslim to be anti Israel.

[-] smoresrock@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah, apparently you don't; You could also be an ignorant, modern Democrat supporting "Palestine" merely because the others in your echo chamber are.

[-] smoresrock@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Of Israel: "I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you." Genesis 12:3

It's amazing how tiny that land is, yet it has withstood millennia of onslaught. Israel is not going down, and efforts to do so are and forever will be futile. I hope this helps at least one person see the truth.

[-] leverage@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago

Yikes, the hasbara is really moldy these days, that doesn't even make sense.

[-] smoresrock@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Read it slower, baba. It'll start to make sense.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

We have due process in this country. If you don't like that, then fuck off.

[-] smoresrock@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Lmao. Couple things: 1) relax, and 2) she wasn't incarcerated; her visa was revoked. That doesn't require due process, since they're discretionary.

Take it easy, man.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

her visa was revoked.

Without due process.

Fuck off, Nazi cunt. Blocked.

[-] smoresrock@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Classic lefty reaction. Just shut down and resort to insults. Cool 😎

[-] green@feddit.nl 2 points 4 months ago

I usually do not get rage-baited, but something about this response clicked something it my soul.

I am not a lefty. I will resort to much worse than insults if ever got my hands on you (or anyone like you).

I hate to co-opt the Canadians but. Elbows up.

[-] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

We're past elbows up, we're currently transitioning to Gloves Off.

[-] uselessRN@lemm.ee 13 points 4 months ago

Her visa was revoked for what? By what judge? Why was she detained? You claim she's "wrong". By whose standard? Trump? He's the ultimate deciding force? What happens when you're wrong? Can we revoke your citizenship?

[-] smoresrock@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Rapid fire over here. Okay, here goes:

  • For being a Hamas supporter.
  • By no judge. Due process is not mandatory in this case.
  • She was detained because she's a Hamas supporter.
  • By The standard designated to terrorist supporters.
  • Yes, Trump. He is our president after all. Commander in Chief and head of the executive branch
  • The policies put in place against terrorists and supporters thereof is the "ultimate deciding force."
  • What happens if I'm wrong about what?
  • How are citizenships revoked? If there's a way, and I meet those conditions, then yes.
[-] uselessRN@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

We have a system of checks and balances. We have something called the judicial branch that determines the law. Not the president. The fact you're ok with trump defying the constitution in this manner further proves this is fascism not nationalism. You don't love our country, you just hate groups that are different. Citizenship can be revoked with probable cause now. All it takes is an ICE agent to show up and detain you. You think it won't happen to you but once you start disagreeing you're gone

[-] uselessRN@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

So writing an opinion article that her university shouldn't be funding Israel because she disagrees with how Israel is handling the conflict makes her a terrorist supporter? No evidence of ties to Hamas or supporting Hamas. Tell me how she supported terrorists and this isn't just an infringement on free speech.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

100 % of Russian Bots agree with smoresrock

[-] uselessRN@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

Nazism isn't nationalism. Loving your country doesn't mean you silence those that disagree with you and "detain" anyone that doesn't look like you.

[-] smoresrock@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Except that's not what's going on here.

Radical Islam groups are designated terrorists. It just so happens that this administration is buckling down and following through with their word on revoking visas to those who support such groups. This is what America wants; the numbers don't lie. You guys are just not used to the follow through.

[-] liuther9@feddit.nl 6 points 4 months ago

Supporting the end of genocide?? She is a terrorist by the looks of it

[-] uselessRN@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

More people voted for someone besides Trump. If no one was an option, they would have won in a landslide. Where is the proof she is a terrorist? What if the next president labels maga hats terrorists? You're deported and no one will ever know.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Smoresrock is a Russian Bot

this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
2462 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48758 readers
1951 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS