32
submitted 1 day ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Wasn't this already debunked as a poor replacement for pumped storage hydro electric? The blocks and the things moving them will always have more wear than water and turbines.

[-] SheenSquelcher@lemm.ee 3 points 11 hours ago

Recycling lithium ion batteries isn't easy either though, and you might not have the geography for hydro.

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 7 hours ago

I believe the argument against solid block gravity batteries is that you can achieve the same thing with water by using old mines or even just digging a 40story hole. If you have room for the 40 story tower then you have room for a more efficient pumped hydro hole.

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
32 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

36824 readers
189 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS